点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
“我们”的生活记录——古代画像砖与现代摄影作品展开展******
中新网西安1月18日电 (记者 阿琳娜)18日，“‘我们’的生活记录——古代画像砖与现代摄影作品展”开幕式在汉景帝阳陵博物院举行。古代画像砖、现代摄影作品和辅展文物三位一体，相辅相成，有机结合。
本次展览由103件展品组成，首先是来自甘肃省博物馆、酒泉市肃州区博物馆、高台县博物馆的画像砖42件，其中一级文物19件、二级文物8件；其次是现代生活摄影作品36幅；汉景帝阳陵博物院馆藏文物25件(组)作为辅助展品，其中一级文物2件，二级文物6件。
图为展出的文物。 阿琳娜 摄展览内容整体分为三部分：第一单元“孜孜不‘卷’”，通过古今劳作场景的对比，展现了不同时代、不同职业、不同背景下人民共同创造人类文明，彰显劳作历史价值和生命意义；第二单元“又见炊烟”，从食材、庖厨、宴饮三个部分，讲述了生活中最平常笃实的幸福，强调“炊烟”是一道人间最温情的风景，亦是根植于内心最深处中的记忆、维系乡思与乡愁的重要纽带；第三单元“马踏春风”，表现人类不断走向远方、探索未知的过程。强调只有不断前行，用心发现真、欣赏美、感悟善，才能达到人生预设目标、获得生命的意义。
“我们”的生活记录——古代画像砖与现代摄影作品展开展。 阿琳娜 摄展览转换解读视角，立足普通人的生活，展现平实场景，讲述平凡故事。从劳作、宴饮、出行三个日常场景入手，以平直叙事方式，由浅入深，构建一场跨越时空的对话，解读国人平凡朴实而细腻的生活方式、生活态度，以期打造一场观众可以自我回顾、自我审视、自我展望的展览，一个营造场景、讲述生活、寻求共鸣的展览，一项有温情、有温暖、有温度的展览，让千年前社会生活与今天人们的现实生活真正联系起来，唤起人们对美好生活的追求。
“我们”的生活记录——古代画像砖与现代摄影作品展开展。 汉景帝阳陵博物院供图近年来，博物院不断加强汉阳陵文物遗址所承载的“文景之治”“汉文化”等优秀传统文化的创造性转化和创新性发展，积极拓宽展陈思路，充分发挥全媒体传播途径，立足线下实体展，突破完善小微展，强化同兄弟单位和业界同仁的交流合作，积极发挥社会力量筹办展览，致力于一展一收获，一步一脚印，全力做好社会文化服务保障。
“我们”的生活记录——古代画像砖与现代摄影作品展开展。 汉景帝阳陵博物院供图本次展览由汉景帝阳陵博物院联合甘肃省博物馆、酒泉市肃州区博物馆、高台县博物馆共同策划举办，展览展期4个月，期间汉阳陵博物院还将围绕展览，逐步推出相关的虚拟展示、展览及展品解读、社教活动等系列推广宣传活动。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)